BR-AE-06: VAT rate of document level allowance with category AE is not 0
Official message
[BR-AE-06] In a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level allowance VAT category code (BT-95) is "Reverse charge" the Document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) shall be 0 (zero).
[BR-AE-06] In a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level allowance VAT category code (BT-95) is "Reverse charge" the Document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) shall be 0 (zero).
[BR-AE-06] In a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level allowance VAT category code (BT-95) is "Reverse charge" the Document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) shall be 0 (zero).
- Severity
- Error The invoice is invalid and may be rejected by the recipient.
- Applies to
- EN 16931 (CII), EN 16931 (UBL), Factur-X / ZUGFeRD EN 16931
- Affected fields
- BG-20, BT-95, BT-96
What does this mean?
For a document level allowance (BG-20) with VAT category (BT-95) AE (Reverse charge) the document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) must be 0 (zero). The rate has another value or is missing.
Typical causes
Category AE was selected but the previous rate (e.g. 19) was kept.
The rate is missing; it must be stated as 0.
How to fix the error
State rate 0 for every document level allowance of category AE.
If the rate does not match the category, correct the category and adjust the VAT breakdown (BG-23).
CII: ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge (ChargeIndicator false)/ram:CategoryTradeTax/ram:RateApplicablePercent, UBL: cac:AllowanceCharge (cbc:ChargeIndicator false)/cac:TaxCategory/cbc:Percent.
In E-Rechnungsfreund
In the invoice form ("Experte" view), section "Zu-/Abschläge auf Dokumentenebene (BG-20/BG-21)" (document level allowances and charges), for every entry of type "Abschlag (BG-20)" (allowance) with "St-Kat." (VAT category) AE enter 0 in the field "St-Satz %" (VAT rate). An empty field is not written to the XML for the allowance/charge.
Example
Wrong
<ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
<ram:ChargeIndicator>
<udt:Indicator>false</udt:Indicator>
</ram:ChargeIndicator>
<ram:ActualAmount>50.00</ram:ActualAmount>
<ram:Reason>Discount</ram:Reason>
<ram:CategoryTradeTax>
<ram:TypeCode>VAT</ram:TypeCode>
<ram:CategoryCode>AE</ram:CategoryCode>
<ram:RateApplicablePercent>19.00</ram:RateApplicablePercent>
</ram:CategoryTradeTax>
</ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
Correct
<ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
<ram:ChargeIndicator>
<udt:Indicator>false</udt:Indicator>
</ram:ChargeIndicator>
<ram:ActualAmount>50.00</ram:ActualAmount>
<ram:Reason>Discount</ram:Reason>
<ram:CategoryTradeTax>
<ram:TypeCode>VAT</ram:TypeCode>
<ram:CategoryCode>AE</ram:CategoryCode>
<ram:RateApplicablePercent>0</ram:RateApplicablePercent>
</ram:CategoryTradeTax>
</ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
For developers: test expression per syntax
EN 16931 (CII) (CII)
Context: //ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge[ram:ChargeIndicator/udt:Indicator=false()]/ram:CategoryTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'AE'][upper-case(ram:TypeCode) = 'VAT']
ram:RateApplicablePercent = 0
EN 16931 (UBL) (UBL)
Context: cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator=false()]/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID)='AE'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']
(xs:decimal(cbc:Percent) = 0)
Factur-X / ZUGFeRD EN 16931 (CII)
Technical ID in the source: FX-SCH-A-000082
Context: //ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge[ram:ChargeIndicator/udt:Indicator='false']/ram:CategoryTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'AE']
ram:RateApplicablePercent = 0
Related validation rules
- BR-AE-01: Not exactly one VAT breakdown for category AE
- BR-AE-02: Seller or buyer identifier missing for invoice line with category AE
- BR-AE-03: Seller or buyer identifier missing for document level allowance with category AE
- BR-AE-04: Seller or buyer identifier missing for document level charge with category AE
- BR-AE-05: VAT rate of invoice line with category AE is not 0
- BR-AE-07: VAT rate of document level charge with category AE is not 0
Last updated:
Explanation of the validation rule, not legal or tax advice.