BR-AF-06: VAT rate of document level allowance with category L (IGIC) is missing or too low
Official message
[BR-AF-06] In a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level allowance VAT category code (BT-95) is "IGIC" the Document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) shall be 0 (zero) or greater than zero.
[BR-AF-06] In a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level allowance VAT category code (BT-95) is "IGIC" the Document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) shall be 0 (zero) or greater than zero.
[BR-AF-06] In a Document level allowance (BG-20) where the Document level allowance VAT category code (BT-95) is "IGIC" the Document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) shall be 0 (zero) or greater than zero.
- Severity
- Error The invoice is invalid and may be rejected by the recipient.
- Applies to
- EN 16931 (CII), EN 16931 (UBL), Factur-X / ZUGFeRD EN 16931
- Affected fields
- BG-20, BT-95, BT-96
What does this mean?
For a document level allowance (BG-20) with VAT category (BT-95) L (IGIC, Canary Islands general indirect tax) the document level allowance VAT rate (BT-96) must be stated. The rate is missing or too low.
The rule text requires "0 (zero) or greater than zero"; the official CII check, however, requires a rate greater than 0, the UBL check a rate of 0 or more.
Typical causes
The rate was not stated.
CII: rate 0 was stated.
How to fix the error
State the rate (greater than zero for CII) for every document level allowance of category L.
If the rate does not match the category, correct the category and adjust the VAT breakdown (BG-23).
CII: ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge (ChargeIndicator false)/ram:CategoryTradeTax/ram:RateApplicablePercent, UBL: cac:AllowanceCharge (cbc:ChargeIndicator false)/cac:TaxCategory/cbc:Percent.
In E-Rechnungsfreund
In the invoice form ("Experte" view), section "Zu-/Abschläge auf Dokumentenebene (BG-20/BG-21)" (document level allowances and charges), for every entry of type "Abschlag (BG-20)" (allowance) with "St-Kat." (VAT category) L fill in the field "St-Satz %" (VAT rate). An empty field is not written to the XML for the allowance/charge.
Example
Wrong
<ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
<ram:ChargeIndicator>
<udt:Indicator>false</udt:Indicator>
</ram:ChargeIndicator>
<ram:ActualAmount>50.00</ram:ActualAmount>
<ram:Reason>Discount</ram:Reason>
<ram:CategoryTradeTax>
<ram:TypeCode>VAT</ram:TypeCode>
<ram:CategoryCode>L</ram:CategoryCode>
</ram:CategoryTradeTax>
</ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
Correct
<ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
<ram:ChargeIndicator>
<udt:Indicator>false</udt:Indicator>
</ram:ChargeIndicator>
<ram:ActualAmount>50.00</ram:ActualAmount>
<ram:Reason>Discount</ram:Reason>
<ram:CategoryTradeTax>
<ram:TypeCode>VAT</ram:TypeCode>
<ram:CategoryCode>L</ram:CategoryCode>
<ram:RateApplicablePercent>7.00</ram:RateApplicablePercent>
</ram:CategoryTradeTax>
</ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge>
For developers: test expression per syntax
EN 16931 (CII) (CII)
Context: //ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge[ram:ChargeIndicator/udt:Indicator=false()]/ram:CategoryTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'L'][upper-case(ram:TypeCode) = 'VAT']
ram:RateApplicablePercent > 0
EN 16931 (UBL) (UBL)
Context: cac:AllowanceCharge[cbc:ChargeIndicator=false()]/cac:TaxCategory[normalize-space(cbc:ID)='L'][cac:TaxScheme/normalize-space(upper-case(cbc:ID))='VAT']
(cbc:Percent) >= 0
Factur-X / ZUGFeRD EN 16931 (CII)
Technical ID in the source: FX-SCH-A-000090
Context: //ram:SpecifiedTradeAllowanceCharge[ram:ChargeIndicator/udt:Indicator='false']/ram:CategoryTradeTax[ram:CategoryCode = 'L']
ram:RateApplicablePercent > 0
Related validation rules
- BR-AF-01: VAT breakdown for category L is missing
- BR-AF-02: Seller VAT or tax registration identifier missing for invoice line with category L
- BR-AF-03: Seller VAT or tax registration identifier missing for document level allowance with category L
- BR-AF-04: Seller VAT or tax registration identifier missing for document level charge with category L
- BR-AF-05: VAT rate of invoice line with category L (IGIC) is missing or too low
- BR-AF-07: VAT rate of document level charge with category L (IGIC) is missing or too low
Last updated:
Explanation of the validation rule, not legal or tax advice.