BR-DEX-10: Third party payment type (BT-DEX-001) is missing

What does this mean?

In an XRechnung extension invoice (UBL), every third party payment (BG-DEX-09) must contain the third party payment type (BT-DEX-001). It is missing or empty.

Typical causes

A third party payment was added with amount and description only.
The element cbc:ID in cac:PrepaidPayment is empty.

How to fix the error

Fill the element cbc:ID with the third party payment type in every cac:PrepaidPayment.
According to BR-DEX-11 and BR-DEX-12, amount (cbc:PaidAmount) and description (cbc:InstructionID) must also be present.
Generate and validate the invoice again.

Example

Wrong

<cac:PrepaidPayment>
  <cbc:ID></cbc:ID>
  <cbc:PaidAmount currencyID="EUR">50.00</cbc:PaidAmount>
  <cbc:InstructionID>...</cbc:InstructionID>
</cac:PrepaidPayment>

Correct

<cac:PrepaidPayment>
  <cbc:ID>...</cbc:ID>
  <cbc:PaidAmount currencyID="EUR">50.00</cbc:PaidAmount>
  <cbc:InstructionID>...</cbc:InstructionID>
</cac:PrepaidPayment>

Related validation rules

• BR-DEX-01: Invalid MIME code of an attachment (BT-125) in the XRechnung extension
• BR-DEX-02: Line net amount does not match the sum of its sub invoice lines
• BR-DEX-03: Sub invoice line without exactly one VAT information (BG-DEX-06)
• BR-DEX-04: Scheme of a party identifier is not an ISO 6523 ICD code (extension)
• BR-DEX-05: Scheme of a registration identifier is not an ISO 6523 ICD code (extension)
• BR-DEX-06: Scheme of the item standard identifier (BT-157) is not an ISO 6523 ICD code (extension)